It's not clear whether rushed cases include Pardon!
PRESS STATEMENT – 22nd Dec 2024
VERSI BM DI MS 2
PMX’s statement “prosecutions rushed, marked by venom, enmity, and political
vengeance by those in power brings disrepute to the independence of AG, Constitution
and the independent institutions in Malaysia
How about his own pardon?
It is grossly unfair for the country's Chief Executive, who has sworn to protect the
Constitution and the institutions of the country, to make such a claim. It brings disrepute to
the independence of the AG, Constitution and the country's independent institutions.
It was widely reported that investigations against Najib and his wife were conducted long
before GE14, a fact that was brought to light after the Sarawak Report exposed the matter
on February 28, 2015, and the US Justice Department's statement in July 2016.
So, how could PMX claim the prosecutions were rushed? Has he forgotten the overnight
removal of the former MACC Director and his officers, the change of Special Branch director,
the transfer of his deputy to a desk job at PMO, the immediate sacking of the AG, and the
hounding of many others who were directly involved in the scandal investigations?
Tommy Thomas, a senior legal practitioner, distinguished and honourable lawyer, was
brought in to restore the AG's Chambers to good governance and accountability after
Najib's actions tainted its institution. To question Tommy's unblemished credibility and the
independence of his actions, which are protected under Article 145 of the Federal
Constitution, is not just an insult to him personally, but also a disrespect to the Constitution.
It is a direct challenge to the independent institution of the country to now say that those
prosecutions, done months after PH won, were rushed and marked by venom, enmity, and
political vengeance by those in power. This claim is most unfair and unbecoming of a Prime
Minister.
Let us now see how Anwar Ibrahim's pardon was rushed. Tun Mahathir was sworn in on
May 10th , 2018, and his first three cabinet members were named on May 12th , 2018.
Anwar Ibrahim's pardon application was heard on May 16, 2018. The Malaysian King
granted him a royal pardon that day, releasing him from prison.
Wasn't PMX's pardon hearing rushed then? Did he bypass many others waiting in line for
their pardon to be heard? Was taking the pardon agenda to the former Agong within days
after his wife was sworn in as Deputy Prime Minister a mistake? These are questions that
demand answers.
Waytha Moorthy Ponnusamy
Kenyataan PMX "pendakwaan tergesa-gesa, ditandai dengan racun, permusuhan, dan dendam politik oleh mereka yang berkuasa membawa penghinaan kepada kebebasan kuasa Peguam Negara, Perlembagaan dan Institusi bebas lain di Malaysia
Bagaimana dengan pengampunan beliau sendiri?
Ia adalah satu ketidakadilan bagi Ketua Eksekutif Negara, yang telah bersumpah untuk melindungi Perlembagaan dan Institusi Negara, untuk membuat tuntutan sedemikian. Tindakan beliau telah mencemarkan nama baik Pejabat Peguam Negara, Perlembagaan dan Institusi bebas negara.
Dilaporkan secara meluas bahawa siasatan terhadap Najib dan isterinya telah dijalankan jauh sebelum PRU14, fakta yang telah didedahkan selepas Sarawak Report mendedahkan perkara itu pada 28 Februari 2015, dan kenyataan Jabatan Kehakiman AS pada Julai 2016.
Jadi, bagaimana PMX boleh mendakwa Pendakwaan terhadap Najib dan Rosmah telah disegerakan? Sudahkah beliau lupa penyingkiran bekas Pengarah SPRM dan pegawai-pegawainya, pertukaran pengarah Cawangan Khas, pertukaran timbalannya ke suatu jawatan meja di PMO, pemecatan serta-merta Peguam Negara ketika itu, dan pengejaran ramai lagi yang terlibat secara langsung dalam siasatan skandal 1MDB?
Bekas Peguam Negara Tommy Thomas, seorang pengamal perundangan kanan dan peguam berwibawa, telah dilantik untuk memastikan Jabatan Peguam Negara dibawa kembali kepada tadbir urus dan akauntabiliti yang baik selepas Najib mencemarkan institusinya dengan memecat bekas Peguam Negara Gani Patail. Kini untuk mempersoalkan kredibiliti Tommy yang tidak tercemar dan kebebasan tindakannya dan fungsi pendakwaannya yang termaktub di bawah Perkara 145 Perlembagaan Persekutuan adalah satu penghinaan langsung terhadapnya secara peribadi dan juga fungsinya seperti yang dinyatakan dalam Perlembagaan.
Ia adalah satu cabaran langsung kepada suatu institusi yang bebas untuk kini mengatakan bahawa pendakwaan itu, yang dilakukan beberapa bulan selepas PH menang, disegerakan dan ditandai dengan racun, permusuhan, dan dendam politik oleh mereka yang berkuasa. Tuntutan ini adalah paling tidak adil dan tidak seharusnya datang dari seorang Perdana Menteri.
Mari kita lihat sekarang sekiranya pengampunan Anwar Ibrahim “disegerakan”. Tun Mahathir mengangkat sumpah pada 10 Mei 2018, dan tiga anggota kabinet pertamanya dinamakan pada 12 Mei 2018.
Permohonan pengampunan Anwar Ibrahim didengar pada 16 Mei 2018. Yang Dipertuan Agong memberikan Pengampunan Diraja hari itu, membebaskannya dari penjara.
Bukankah perbicaraan Lembaga Pengampunan PMX disegerakan ketika itu? Adakah dia memintas ramai lagi yang menunggu dalam barisan untuk pengampunan mereka didengari? Adakah membawa agenda pengampunan kepada bekas Agong dalam masa beberapa hari selepas isteri PMX dilantik sebagai Timbalan Perdana Menteri juga satu kesilapan? Ini adalah persoalan yang memerlukan jawapan.
Waytha Moorthy Ponnusamy
DISCLAIMER:
The views expressed here are those of the writer and do not necessarily represent the views of the website cpiasia.org and the online Borneo-centric Center for Policy Analysis (CPI) Think Tank.