• Print
Details
Category: Domestic & International Trade

Many attribute Malaysia’s admirable economic growth to liberal economic policies. However, this view ignores the way coalitional politics often drove illiberal government intervention in the economy to correct ethnically based economic inequality, create national heavy industries, and favor politically well-connected entrepreneurs. A more nuanced analysis reveals a complex mix of liberal and illiberal economic policies designed to balance competing coalitional interests. These policies led to rapid economic growth sufficient to support redistributive politics. Yet they also retarded technological development, leaving Malaysia mired in mediocrity: neither price competitive with China nor technologically competitive with Singapore, the East Asian NICs, or the OECD countries.

Coalitional Politics, Economic Reform, and Technological Upgrading in Malaysia

By Bryan K. Ritchie. Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA.

[Download]
Write comment (0 Comments)

  • Print
Details
Category: Domestic & International Trade

This report is part of the advisory services being provided by the World Bank at the request of the Government of Malaysia. The first phase of advisory services includes (i) the firm-level survey and (ii) the report on firm competitiveness. The second phase is aimed at implementing the findings of this report and will include (i) TA to reform skills and technology institutes, and (ii) a detailed study on services as a source of growth.

This report was prepared by Ejaz Ghani and Albert G. Zeufack (Co-Task Leaders), Ana Margarida Fernandes, Hiau Looi Kee, Aart C. Kraay, Manjula M. Luthria, and Charles C. Udomsaph. The peer reviewers were Barry Bosworth, Indermit Gill, Arvind Subramanian, and Shahid Yusuf. Albert G. Zeufack took the lead in the design and implementation of the Productivity and Investment Climate Survey. Production of the report was supported by Hedwig Abbey. Editorial assistance was provided by Emily Evershed. The preparation of this report benefited greatly from the assistance and cooperation provided by the Government of Malaysia. In particular, the authors would like to thank officials in the Economic Planning Unit (EPU), the Ministry of Finance, the Ministry of Trade and Industry, the Malaysian Industrial Development Authority, Bank Negara Malaysia, the Ministry of Human Resources, and the Department of Statistics for their generous help in providing data and explanations to the mission. A World Bank mission visited Malaysia from June 9 to June 18, 2003. The diagnostics of the firm level data was carried out jointly with the EPU staff during this period.

Based on the Productivity and Investment Climate Survey conducted between December 2002 and May 2003 with reference period of 1999-2001. Published on June 30, 2005. Poverty Reduction, Economic Management, and Financial Sector Unit (PREM), East Asia and Pacific Region, The World Bank.  [Download]
Write comment (0 Comments)

  • Print
Details
Category: Domestic & International Trade

There is a need to stimulate the domestic economy, particularly investment, as the economy has largely been driven by consumption and the external sector in the past several years. Now that the external segment has toned down, the domestic sector has little choice but to step up further.

Publication/Conference MIERScan, 1 October 2007

[Download]
Write comment (0 Comments)

  • Print
Details
Category: Domestic & International Trade

Foreign direct investment (FDI) has played a critical role in Malaysia’s development strategy. The government continues to rely heavily on FDI as a means to finance development. However, FDI stocks for Malaysia have been stagnating since the financial crisis and is worrying especially when compared to our competitors.

Publication/Conference MIERScan, 18 February 2008.

[Download]
Write comment (0 Comments)

More Articles...

  1. Innovation in South-East Asia: lessons for Europe?
  2. Need to Reinvent Food Processing Industry in Malaysia
  3. Malaysia antithesis of secular state?
  4. A Relook at Our Educational Priorities