• Home
  • About CPI
  • Activities
  • Email Us

India, please help our Indians?

  • Print
  • Email
Details
Category: Helen Ang
Published: Monday, 29 December 2008 05:47
Posted by Helen Ang
The government is willing to help Malays in other countries where they are a minority, Deputy Prime Minister Najib Razak said recently. 

May I appeal to the government of India to help Indians in Malaysia who are a minority?  

The Umno-led Barisan Nasional, while it is willing to “assist the advancement of Malays??? anywhere in the world – or even a half Malay in England like Sufiah Yusof, the math prodigy turned hooker – has not shown the same assiduity to help our fully Malaysian Indians. 

Given how poor the Tamil underclass is, we can term it an appeal for ‘humanitarian aid’. 

May I plead also to American President elect Barack Obama to help Christians in Malaysia who are a minority? The United States is a Christian country (though not a Christian state) as its national motto is ‘In God We Trust’. 

In America we trust to help uplift Malaysian Christians. The BN government, by token of its own action, should welcome any assistance extended to Malaysia’s minorities.  

To assist our non-bumiputeras’ spiritual advancement, churches are necessary though not asking extravagant American funding to build grand cathchurch above motor shopedrals. A modest monetary grant for homely churches – something reminiscent of the one in Little House on the Prairie will do fine. 

At present some ‘churches’ in Malaysia are located in shoplots or rented space in factory buildings. Such a haphazard set-up may in fact contravene building safety regulations. Imagine a large congregation cramped into a small shoplot room on the second storey, and a fire breaks out. 

Perhaps Christians should request American professional town planners sent too in the aid package.  

Chinese must help Chinese 

The Chinese community in Malaysia is very rich (throw a stone and you will hit a towkay or Tan Sri), and that is why we Chinese do not need Chindraf. Taking a leaf from Najib, we in our abundant prosperity must help our Chinese brethren in other countries where they are a poor, downtrodden minority. 

We must share our knowledge and export our coping skills to Chinatowns the world over. Why do the overseas Chinese elect to live in single-race enclaves? We must teach them how to assimilate. 

Houses of the Lord that look almost exactly like a shophouse or a factory annex reflect a successful model of Chinese assimilation. In fact, some have assimilated so well they don’t even display the representation of a cross. They only make themselves known to the public that they are churches through their shop signboards which name the premises as a church. Baptist church 

Malaysian Calvinists par excellence must help their Chinese kith and kin of the diaspora to embrace the same ‘making do’ philosophy. Make do that church architecture and its physical environment is not the paramount concern.  

After all, church is really the spirit of the congregation and the Old Testament tells that when the exiled Jews were wondering in the desert, church was simply a tent erected on the shifting sands.  

Isn’t a shoplot-church still miles better than a tent-church? Count our blessings because “Blessed are the meek: for they shall inherit the earth??? [Matthew 5:5]. 

There was even one suggestion from Member of Parliament Zulkifli Nordin that a mosque specifically for Chinese Muslims be built on the site of the former Pudu Jail. What a nice inheritance! 

Indian who did not help Indians 

I recall attending a Hindraf forum a few days prior to the mammoth November rally. I sat next to an Indian guy who told me he cried when he saw how an old but ‘illegal’ (aren’t they all?) temple was destroyed. It was an episode where the local authorities were really ugly in their behaviour.  

Yes, a grown Indian man cried. The enforcement officers smashing Hindu deities break the hearts of grown Indian women too. It is in the emotional nature of Indians to shed tears; ex-premier Dr Mahathir Mohamed is not shy to publicly sniff and sob.  

Dr M studied medicine in Singapore. We have good minority cross race relations across the Causeway. 

Our neighbour shares the philosophy expounded by Najib. She helps Chinese minorities elsewhere and Malaysians are main recipients of Asean scholarships to study in Singapore.  

Our government ought to reciprocate by offering Singapore Malays scholarships on condition these Mara beneficiaries be bonded to serve in Malaysia thereafter.

Oops, I’ve clean forgotten about Indians. Yup, that bunch complaining incessantly about temple demolitions.  

A current online poll in the Hindu Sangam website asks if “rituals and prayers are the most crucial factors in Hinduism???. Of the respondents, 54 percent said ‘Yes’. Aha! It must be this simple majority (not even two-thirds) that is raising the unholy hue and cry, though nobody in government bothers to listen. 

The movement formerly known as Hindraf had been insisting Indians are ‘marginalised’ – a word which implies they have no voice and very little say in this country.  

Since Hindraf is no more to speak on their behalf, may I suggest that Malaysian Indians appeal to the government of India to help out?  

Truly, Najib, the Prime Minister designate of Malaysia would not mind nor would he object as he himself has said his government is willing to help Malays in other countries where they are a minority. His mentor Dr M popularized the slogan ‘Leadership by example’. The good times are back.

Write comment (3 Comments)

Penang Umno on 'Amar Makruf Nahi Mungkar'

  • Print
  • Email
Details
Category: Helen Ang
Published: Sunday, 23 November 2008 11:00
Posted by Helen Ang
By Helen Ang

 

At the state assembly sitting on Thursday, Penang chief minister Lim Guan Eng fielded criticism from Umno representative Shabudin Yahya who chided him for misusing the term 'Amal Makruf Nahi Mungkar' for political gain.
 
Malaysiakini reported that Lim denied deriving political mileage as charged by Umno but rather "was attempting to absorb the values espoused by the term in his governance as he wanted to infuse Penang's administration with the values of other religions and cultures".
 
Earlier, Lim had come under fire too from former Penang deputy chief minister, Umno's Dr Hilmi Yahaya.

The present deputy CM, Mohammad Fairus Khairuddin of PKR however defend­ed Lim's use of 'Amar Makruf Nahi Mungkar' as something Muslims should be proud of.
 
Fairus added that the state mufti had said there was nothing wrong in the CM quoting the phrase.

If we're agreed on the shared values at the core of the major faiths, then we can appreciate how their scriptures have enriched our lexicon. Think of the teachings of Christianity which have found a place in our vocabulary, such as 'Love thy neighbour as yourself' and 'Do to others what you would have them do to you'.

Doesn't Umno's nitpicking then negate the universality of the 'Amar Makruf Nahi Mungkar' message?

Below is my English translation of an article which appeared in the PAS-affiliated website Tranungkite on Nov 19 headlined 'Will Umno faint away if Guan Eng understands Islam?'

It is written by 'anakbulan'

______________________

 

A visitor Helen Ang had left an e-mail in my Inbox drawing my attention to a piece of news in Malaysiakini titled 'K'jaan Guan Eng ditegur silap eja 'Amar' (Guan Eng's government taken to task for misspelling 'Amar'). She asked for my view on the matter.
 
Let's have a quick look at the article. *** An Umno assemblyman had reprimanded the Penang state government for wrongly spelling the word 'Amar' on the Pakatan Rakyat banner which dotted the landscape in conjunction with the Hari Raya celebration recently.

The reproof came from Datuk Dr Hilmi Yahaya (Umno-Teluk Bahang) because of the misspelling to the sentence 'Amar Makruf Nahi Mungkar' – which carries the meaning 'menyuruh kebaikan dan menjauhi kejahatan' (To enjoin what is good and abhor what is evil).

The banner instead bore the wording 'Amal Makruf Nahi Mungkar'. According to Hilmi, 'amal' means "melakukan" (to practise) whereas 'amar' means "menyuruh" (enjoining). Therefore the spelling mistake connoted a different sense of 'Amar Makruf Nahi Mungkar'. He also questioned whether Lim – a non-Muslim – is qualified to use Quranic verses to refer to the governance of his state.

Hilmi said the phrase was an ayat (verse) from the al-Quran for Muslims and as such, doubted whether the non-Muslim Penang chief minister should have invoked it. In relation to this, Hilmi asked the Islamic religious authorities to clarify on the issue.

Lim often uses this ayat in his speeches, including at his public debate with Tan Sri Dr Koh Tsu Koon in August, as well as in the Hari Raya banners which were recently put up prominently throughout the state. Hilmi also castigated Lim for equating his rule with that of Caliph Umar Abdul Aziz, and asked Lim to prove his good governance first before comparing with others. ***

 
The following is my explanation in reply to Helen Ang.


wassalam

Firstly, it is a good reminder which Lim Guan Eng should heed. But a mistake such as this is not tantamount to insulting Islam, and it can be corrected.

I feel LGE should consult an expert in ilmu lughah (philology/exegesis). 'Amar Makruf Nahi Mungkar' and 'Amal Makruf Nahi Mungkar': To me, both are erroneous for being rendered in Malay. It is not LGE or DAP members only who are confused, the Umno people too may be unaware if not reproached.

'Amar' is correct to replace 'amal' which carries a different meaning even though both words are in the form of 'fe'el amr'. 'Mungkar' has been Malay-ized from the original Arabic 'mim + nun + kaf + ro', and this is similarly incorrect as well even though there are those who proffer the excuse that they have approximated it (meng'ikhfak'kannya*). Accurate spelling and pronunciation should refer to the jawi script. Insya Allah.

That's all I think there is to it. If I were to render Mandarin or Tamil phonetically in Roman script, I'm sure the result will be hilarious or not as exact as if I were to read the languages in their original written characters. Agree? If I'm mistaken, I apologize.

Secondly, Hilmi queried if Lim – a non-Muslim – is qualified to use Quranic verses to refer to the governance of his state. He said the ayat from the al-Quran was for Muslims and expressed his doubt that the Chief Minister should have used 'Amar Makruf Nahi Mungkar'.

Hilmi probably does not understand the 'uslub' and 'manhaj' of dakwah (ways and means/methods to proselytizing) and was politicking too much in this regard.. I ask him to show which nas qat'iey [ayat from Quran or Hadith used in determining Islamic jurisprudence or hukum syarak] forbids non-Muslims from making Quranic verses a basis of their sayings.

Islam is a blessing for all mankind, for all races, and in fact, there are more Muslims in China than there are Malays in number.

Islam is inclusive in nature, not exclusive to Hilmi and his Malay race solely. In my opinion, Hilmi's statement just proves how Umno has failed since before Merdeka in explaining Islam to the non-Muslims.

For sure, Islam is not ‘seburuk’ (as intolerant) as depicted by Hilmi. It is hoped that Hilmi repents. On a personal note, I'm amazed by what has been carried out by LGE's administration. The problem is Malays in Penang have been too much Umno-ized [influenced by Umno] to the extent of their looking at non-Muslims as the 'enemy' that is threatening their 'ketuanan'. In reality, Islam teaches its adherents to bring non-Muslims into the fold through dakwah.

Islam is not Umno's right alone. Islam belongs to all the children of Adam. Who is Umno or Hilmi to gainsay this? Thank you. This response is my personal perspective. Perhaps other visitors to this website might care to share their understanding on the discussion. The floor is open.

 [Dictionary definition: Ikhfak = bunyi nun mati (sukun) atau tanwin yang didengungkan sepanjang dua harakat ketika bertemu dengan salah satu daripada huruf ta, sa, jim, dal, zal, zai, sin, syin, sad, dad, ta, za, fa, kaf, qaf.]

The original article in Malay can be read here, http://www.tranungkite.net/v7/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=18618


Write comment (8 Comments)

Anil proposes, Chamil disposes

  • Print
  • Email
Details
Category: Helen Ang
Published: Monday, 17 November 2008 15:15
Posted by Helen Ang

Anil proposes, Chamil disposes


Helen Ang


Two seasoned journalists Anil Netto and Chamil Wariya tried their maiden hand at fiction with differing results.

 

Anil’s short story ‘Penang back to the future’ took me down memory lane. Its protagonist Ann had spent “a happy, carefree childhood playing on the streets with the children from the pre-war double-storey terrace houses along Bangkok Lane in Pulau Tikus???.

 

I think anyone who’s grown up in Penang would be able to identify with the nostalgia of “a simpler, less polluted, less congested era???. 

 

Bangkok Lane was where I grew up and the two rows of houses Anil mentioned still belong to my great-grandfather Cheah Leong Keah’s estate. I too hung out with the neighbours, a gaggle of girls around my age who would all walk to the pasar malam in nearby Gurney Drive to buy hairpins and earrings, and tuck into the night market’s Hokkien mee and leng chee kang.

 

Anil writes of the Bangkok Lane satay stall but, aaah, he omitted to add that it was the satay seller’s bread toasted with dripping that was to die for. The story’s central character, Ann, remembers the aunties living in the lane and other scenes of Ye Olde Penang that older Penangites will recall as well, such as the vegetable farms of Tanjong Tokong and the durian orchards of Balik Pulau.

 

Published in March 8: The Day Malaysia Woke Up, Anil’s cerpen appears in Part Two of the book under the section ‘Hope’; the compilation of essays and interviews in Part One is tagged ‘Change’.

 

The setting of ‘Penang back to the future’ comes 10 years after the watershed 2008 general election. Anil draws from our real-life political milieu, “Out went the politicians who abused their positions of power. Penangites instead voted for a new slate of untested candidates …??? and he projects onto a year-2018 scenario.

 

Electing to weave his wish list into futuristic imagination, Anil stands apart from most of the other book contributors who composed factual articles. His green policies see a return of trams, “buses doing a fabulous job???, cars barred from entering the city centre, and the Penang Turf Cluf land – the source of a ‘Patrick Badawi’ controversy – converted into a 260-acre People’s Park.

 

Penangites shedding their practice of littering, the island’s notorious drivers switching to bicycles, local councils conducting elections, ISA abolished and Aung San Suu Kyi becoming the Prime Minister of Myammar are among Anil’s hopeful proposals.

 

REAL ‘MAY 13’ UNTOLD

 

In the author description, Anil is credited as “a freelance journalist and blogger based in Penang with an interest in human rights, environmental, social justice and public accountability issues???. Readers familiar with Anil’s journalism would be aware that his foray into fiction similarly articulates these same things he cares about.

 

Another short story also derived from the current political scenario, but Chamil’s mean-spirited cerpen is far from life-affirming. Unlike Anil who proposes positive change, Chamil in his character assassination story disposes of a life.

 

‘Politik Baru YB J’ was published in the Utusan Malaysia newspaper and has had its share of detractors and defenders. MP Teresa Kok is suing the author, alleging the story’s protagonist is modelled after herself. Chamil was granted an English language platform in The Nut Graph to retort that “YB Josephine was a made-up character that has no resemblance at all to the Seputeh Member of Parliament???.

 

Josephine is mischievously portrayed as “anti-Islam, anti-Melayu???, and the description of her is someone who “mahu menghapuskan tulisan jawi dan ganti dengan tulisan Cina??? (destroy the Jawi script to be replaced by Chinese writing).

 

Interestingly enough, Chamil’s cerpen makes a note of the March 8 book, in addition to a clutch of other distinguishing facts which mark out the ‘Teresa-world’ of his plot. Details contained in the cerpen are revealing of the essayist’s mindset but not historical accuracy. On the May 13 episode, Chamil wrote “selepas pilihan raya umum pada 10 Mei itu, orang Cina dan Melayu berbunuh-bunuhan??? (following the May 10 general election, Chinese and Malays were killing each other).

 

As we know, it was the Chinese who suffered the heavy death toll and casualties, indicating in which direction the slaughter took place. Or to adopt a postmortem perspective, May 13 is a spectre employed to instil fear in the Chinese community whereas no rabble-rousing politician wields the fateful date to scare Malays. 

 

Even if we’re charitable enough to preclude intimidation and defamation of Teresa, the context in which ‘Politik Baru YB J’ was put across to readers still constitutes harassment of a people’s representative, one who had only just earlier been ISA-ed and received death threats.

 

Utusan is a populist vernacular newspaper carrying out a sustained campaign of vilification against the said MP. The newspaper’s vendetta extends to ‘poetic licence’ name-calling her ‘Ratu Anjing’. This is in addition to its news reports and negative op-eds catering to the lowest common denominator and inciting hate..


And as a woman, I can sympathise when Teresa complained that the newspaper deliberately splashed the most unflattering photographs frontpage to make her look as ugly as possible (when she actually has a feminine demeanour).

 

STANDING ON SIDE OF POWER

 

Aside from his insistence of “no resemblance at all???, Chamil claimed: “The cerpen is also a reminder to politicians not to incite communal sentiments in the name of politics,??? and adding, "I must stress what was murdered in the cerpen was not a politician per se, but extreme ideas …???

 

Among the many public rebuttals to Chamil’s thin assertions, one by journalist-playwright Kee Thuan Chye, said: “Why not, for example, write one [cerpen] based on the famous instance when Hishammuddin Hussein wielded the keris????

 

On that bit about metaphorically “murdering extreme ideas???, Kee’s rejoinder was: “Why doesn't Chamil go for the obvious case and write about Umno politicians who have been playing the racial card for the last how many decades????

 

What struck me though was Kee’s charge that ‘YB J’ was written on the side of power. Chamil is a Datuk and CEO of the Malaysian Press Institute; his bare-faced statement – “While certain quarters take offence at the storyline and make issues out of it, the majority who read the cerpen take it positively and rationally??? – is typical ‘take-my-word-for-it’ speechifying from the side of power.

 

Some old habits die hard too. One instance is traditional media passing itself off as ‘New’ but nonetheless still writing for the side of power and like a stenographer, conscientiously transcribing the excuses from Who’s-he-kidding-Chamil.


As there was a lack of input on the cerpen coming from Teresa’s camp published in The Nut Graph to balance Chamil, I’m reminded of MalaysiaVotes (Nut Graph’s name before its rebranding) earlier this year giving 3,000-plus kind words to Khairy Jamaluddin in contrast to a 400-word write-up on KJ’s opponent in the Rembau election contest.

 

Words, be they in fiction, in news reports or in blogs, give shape to ideas. In recent years, stale notions have been slowly, painfully reevaluated. But change has to be in tandem with new approaches … hope springs eternal.


Note: Kee Thuan Chye, Azmi Sharom, Helen Ang, Animah Kosai and Chacko Vadaketh will be at Silverfish Books in Bangsar, KL on Sat (Nov 22, 5.30 pm) for readings of ‘March 8: The Day Malaysia Woke Up’. Helen will be reading excerpts from the chapter ‘Enough of the NEP’.


Write comment (0 Comments)

Honey, I shrunk the Indians

  • Print
  • Email
Details
Category: Helen Ang
Published: Friday, 21 November 2008 05:31
Posted by Helen Ang

By Helen Ang

Two weeks ago on Nov 4, the New Straits Times carried the headline ‘Zaid lucky to be born a Malay, says Syed Hamid’.

Former law minister Zaid Ibrahim had said in his LawAsia 2008 conference speech on Oct 31: "The obsession with the Ketuanan Melayu doctrine has in fact destroyed something precious in us.

"It makes us lose our sense of balance and fairness."

The statement unsurprisingly caused Umno warlords to go berserk.

Read more: Honey, I shrunk the Indians

Write comment (18 Comments)

BN bully and beggar’s beef

  • Print
  • Email
Details
Category: Helen Ang
Published: Wednesday, 22 October 2008 13:40
Posted by Helen Ang

By Helen Ang

The accusation ‘Umno bully’ saw both sides dancing with shadows, one defending and the other denying the charge.

Just-retired MCA chief Ong Ka Ting made the allegation by invoking perception. Ong said in his keynote address on Saturday that many people perceive power-sharing by BN to be neither effective nor fair, and Umno seen as dominant. He said the power-sharing is only seen as lip service and pleaded to the Prime Minister that it should not be viewed as though Umno alone determines policies.

It’s reflective of MCA that Ong can’t even talk straight at his own party’s recent general assembly but instead resorted to words like ‘perceive’, ‘seen as’ and ‘viewed as though’.

It’s also reflective of BN that the coalition chairman Abdullah Ahmad Badawi categorically denied Umno is a bully. Abdullah told MCA members not to believe Ong was a weak leader easily bullied. Cabinet discussed issues in a cordial, co-operative and constructive manner, Abdullah said.

Umno says, MCA obeys; and the latter being told one thing and actually experiencing another has led to a party that can’t think straight. Its Youth wing called for the creation of a second BN deputy chairman post and MCA to be given this chair. There’s even talk of ‘MCA deputy PM’.

Sunday Star reported Abdullah as saying, “There is no such thing as bully but we are all friends??? and that “he had also given in to Ong’s appeal for MCA’s quota in the Cabinet to be retained despite its losses in the general election.???

Two questions: (1) Is MCA’s preoccupation with Cabinet crumbs to the benefit of party leaders, or the community they claim to represent? (2) Do you think that even if the MCA president was job-titled – say, ‘Great Grand Vizier’ – instead of Housing Minister, he would have been less impotent in the BN set-up?

What a joke to make demands when Umno’s pole position in the BN pecking order is consolidated, not diminished by the March 8 results. And incredulous how MCA delegates have yet to comprehend that while their party was set back, Umno had a good run. Whereas the Chinese vote swing against BN was about 30%, Malay swing was only some 5%. So not only does Umno remain the biggest single bloc by far in Parliament with 79 seats, it’s holding the Malay ground.

 

BN way or the (ouch, tolled) highway

 

In my previous article ‘The Hundraf of Umno’s making’, I presented other facets to the statistics cited by Syed Hamid Albar. However, to show up the selectivity of the Home Minister in pitting Malay against Indian, I had most unfortunately to talk his lingo and play at his game. And the name of the BN game is unchangingly Race and Religion.

The BN methodology of ‘proper channels’ and ‘consensus’ made a mockery of MCA and Gerakan. The ‘dacing' racialism should be shredded, just like state papers were after Selangor Menteri Besar Mohd Khir Toyo’s fall. The BN rainbow coalition has failed to convince us how politicians sharing our skin colour have our best interests at heart.

Pakatan Rakyat’s Khalid Ibrahim is one heartening example of progressive leadership. The present Selangor Menteri Besar has been supportive of dismantling NEP and suggested opening UiTM to non-Malays; Khalid is pushing the envelope where we’ve previously heard mousy squeaks from MCA.

Responding to the Conference of Rulers’ Oct 16 statement on safeguarding Malay special position, he said Malaysians could continue to speak out on the execution of policies in regard to the social contract. “This (reminder) does not restrict or stop the people from speaking out and commenting in terms of its execution but it is best if the people can respect the culture and etiquette of one another,??? he was quoted as saying.

Respect for social justice is a good alternative approach rather than the ‘social contract’ that’s being bandied about. Economic catch-up, in nature preferential for Malays, can be defended if the other side of the barter – political rights for Chinese and Indians – is adhered to.

 

Umno’s poisoned chalice

 

Hundraf has arisen as an equal and opposite reaction to Umno’s actions – a party which does not embody the budi bahasa of the Malay.

The present injection of testosterone into Gerakan and MCA – following the confession by former Gerakan president Lim Keng Yaik that Umno satellites are like ‘beggars’ in the BN, and now the admission of ‘bullying’ by Ong – would be hilarious if not for the rank hypocrisy so long an ingredient of the BN infantile formula.

As the two (i.e. Chinese and Chinese-dominated) parties now attempt to be men and not mice, it falls to Gerakan Wanita chief Tan Lian Hoe to call the Malay ‘immigrants’.

What’s her purpose? After all, her party accepts the sovereignty of the Malay rulers, the status of Malay as national language and other aspects of Malay overlordship. Questioning Malay indigenity to score political points is not only pointless, it’s unproductive.

The minorities’ beef is with Umno, not with the Malay race, and bully to which Malay pocket all the money has gone.

If you agree with me that the BN infant formula is a tainted milk product, then you can grasp how the ruling elites are a poison to race relations. I have one word for MCA – melamine.  

Write comment (0 Comments)

More Articles...

  1. The Hundraf of Umno’s making
  2. Hindraf demonised: Polishing the devil’s horns
  3. Great eggpectations
  4. Anoo-war and our eggciting times

Page 212 of 275

  • Start
  • Prev
  • 207
  • 208
  • 209
  • 210
  • 211
  • 212
  • 213
  • 214
  • 215
  • 216
  • Next
  • End

Policy Papers

  • History
  • NEP
  • East Malaysia
    • East Malaysia
    • Sabah
    • Sarawak
  • Economics
  • Development
    • Nation Development
    • Town Planning
    • Regional Development
  • Environment
  • Education
  • Foreign relations & treaties
  • Media & Technology
  • Social
  • Labour
  • Governance & Public Administration
  • Law & Order
  • Election & Politics
Facebook Image

Mailing List